Things Too
Fierce to Mention:
That Which Is (Not) a Bug
by Philip Johns
Some things
just ain't right. Near us, much nearer than most of us would
like, is a menagerie of things that creep and crawl, flop and
twitch, a Hieronymus Bosch-scape, a carnival sideshow. One of
my favorite words is herpetology, the study of reptiles,
but deriving from the Greek herpetos more literally the
study of things that crawl on their bellies. This brings to mind
an old tune by the Coasters ("She walks, she talks, she
crawls on her belly like a reptile ..."). Among the initiated,
the American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists is
known as "Ichs and Herps." Icks and herps, indeed.
I am not a herpetologist; I study bugs. Which includes what?
Anything spineless and annoying? Anything with jointed legs?
Any insect? Here's how it breaks down: There are things with
exoskeletons and lots of jointed legs (Phylum Arthropoda),
and some folks would call the ones on land "bugs".
Among these animals is a group with only six legs, three major
body segments, single pair of antennae, and a few other features
that make them real insects (Class Insecta). A lot of
people would call these "bugs". The reason entomologists
are sometimes loose with the word "bug" is that within
insects is a group of "true bugs" (Order Hemiptera,
Suborder Heteroptera), things with semi-scleritized wings
("hemelytra") and sucking mouthparts. On top of that,
some very popular texts use an older taxonomy with different
terminology, and everyone in the know is familiar with the older
terms. And for arcane reasons, spider people often publish in
entomological journals.
Mostly, I don't care. To bring up the etymology of entomology
every time someone points to a creepy-crawly would be pedantic.
Lord knows I hate being pedantic. So some bugfolk use "bug"
more loosely in casual conversation than your average third-grader.
(When a centipede runs through the kitchen, a friend's nine year
old will squeal, "eeww, a Myriapod.") Microbiologists
call things in their petri dishes bugs, and I say: solidarity,
brother. I have spiders and scorpions in my personal bestiary,
and in my eyes they are all bugs. At least in casual conversation.
Recently I led a group of students, my happy few, on a trip
to Puerto Rico to see bugs. Here I mean insects: six legs, three
major bodily divisions, the works. In the wet forest at El Yunque
National Park we enjoyed pleasant damp weather as we wandered
and netted and captured and photographed and vialed-and occasionally
reviled-umpteen bugs, all in a misguided attempt to learn entomology.
What my students learned was: don't ride anywhere in my van,
and expect to get lost. I'm good at getting lost.
One night my students and I went to see something that was,
only in the broadest definition, a bug. This animal was supposed
to make a nightly appearance at the base of a very large rock.
Without telling them where we were headed, I marched my students,
headlamps bobbing, up a muddy rainforest trail and promptly forgot
which rock hid the predictable beast.
Undeterred, I continued marching up the mountain, hoping my
students wouldn't guess what had happened. We crossed, one at
a time, dark and rushing waters on a cable bridge. On the other
side was a bigger rock that I knew often hid cool nocturnal bugs-the
six-legged kind (but not "true" bugs). Not what I wanted
to show my people, but better than admitting defeat. I urged
my students to shine their lights under the car-size boulder
and look for antennae and legs. No antennae or legs displayed
themselves. Another Johns boondoggle. My de facto TA,
Lucy, generously offered to crawl under the rock.
"Sure, go ahead," I said.
"Will it help?" She sounded dubious.
"Can't hurt." I was just as dubious.
"Will I get hurt?"
"I don't see how."
"No, I mean, will anything bad happen to me?" Lucy
was as exasperated as her Peanuts namesake. "Is there anything
poisonous or dangerous under the rock?"
"It's Puerto Rico," I said. "There's nothing
dangerous here."
And Lucy prepared to do her own Little Egypt impression, squatting
on her hands and knees. Someone's flashlight beam passed just
above her forehead, a few inches from the boulder. "What's that?"
It took a moment for us to register what clung to the boulder
inches above Lucy's noggin. A palpable wave of revulsion washed
over my group. The beast that I had hoped to see was there, in
full glory, eating a frog. This particular amblypygid was not
just big. It was huge. The frog that hung in its jaws was three
inches long, maybe a little longer. Our eyes followed creature's
second pair of legs from end to end: more than fourteen inches
across, and they were not fully spread.
"Lucy. Don't. Stand. Up," someone advised. (Lucy,
an EMT and the epitome of self-confidence, later suggested that
she would have had a seizure if this beast had crawled on her.)
More closely related to spiders and scorpions than insects,
amblypygids are in the Class Arachnida. Among the things
that differentiates them from insects are a superfluity of legs
and a "cephalothorax" (= head + thorax) rather than
two distinct body regions in front of the abdomen. Sometimes
called tailless whip scorpions or whip spiders, these ten-legged
beasties use their serrated appendages to catch and then, out
of just plain meanness, tear their prey apart. (That isn't quite
accurate; amblypigids suck their prey's guts out, too.) I do
not know why amblypygids in Puerto Rico are so big, but I suspect
it has to do with the lack of mammalian predators. Whip spiders
are the tigers of the island rainforest. And they are large.
Given that this is a column about sex, I should mention the
mating practices of these fair creatures. Here's what's cool:
Males provide sperm on little lollypop apparatuses called spermatophores.
These packages o' love are not at all unique among arthropods,
but whip spiders, scorpions, and pseudoscorpions (tiny, mite-size things without stingers) provide them on little
springy stalks. Males deposit them on the ground, then maneuver
females to walk over the spermatophores, where - sproing! - the
spermatophores' contents release into the females' genital openings.
Most female arthropods are bigger than males, and male scorpions
run some risk of becoming lunch. When wooing a female, the first
thing male scorpions and pseudoscorpions do is grab the females'
pinchers to keep from getting, well, pinched. And then they dance.
No, I'm not kidding; the technical term for this phase of scorpion
courtship is the pas de deux. And then they "kiss."
The kiss is a phase in which male and female lock mouthparts,
and it has more to do with making sure the female is in the right
place than with affection. Amblypygids are the coy boys of the
arachnid world; they turn away from their intended as they deposit
each spermatophore and they don't dance.
Not all scorpion biologists are thrilled with terms such as kiss and pas de deux. ("Thrilling", by the
way, is another behavior male scorpions use to woo females.)
Me, I like words. And the fact that entomologists and arachnologists,
beetle-browed and poking their collective proboscis among the
dried and pinned and alcohol bound, find romance and poetry in
the scuttling of scorpions and their ilk never fails to make
me smile.
Lucy and the rest of my crew stared in awe at the spectacle.
We took pictures until I accidentally brushed against the whip
spiders longest pair of legs. The amblypygid quickly took its
midnight snack elsewhere. A mentor of mine once quipped that
the only entomology news to reach the general public is "Bug
Eats Frog". He'll be disappointed to see me perpetuate this
trend. I think bugs are beautiful, things to be admired and painted
and cooed over. More poetry should be written about bugs. But
not all arthropods, not always. Seeing the amblypygid eating
a frog, this nightmare creature from the darkest Caribbean jungle,
I remembered Cormac McCarthy's line about vaporous beings in
regions beyond right knowing where the eye wanders and the lip
jerks and drools. As it went, limp frog dangling from its maw,
I could only think that some things just ain't right.
And while he was at it, also
from "Mister Pseudoscorpion":
Weygoldt, P. 1999. Spermatophores and the evolution of female
genitalia in whip spiders.Journal
of Arachnology 27: 103-116.